Head-to-Head · 2026

Affilka by SOFTSWISS vs MyAffiliates

Updated May 2026

Overall winner: MyAffiliates · 0.2-point lead

affilka logo Affilka by SOFTSWISS
iGaming-Native Rank #9

77.0

/ 100 overall

Read review
myaffiliates logo MyAffiliates
iGaming-Native Rank #8

77.2

/ 100 overall

★ Top Scorer Read review

At a glance

Quick comparison

Every weighted category, side-by-side. Bars show category-level percentage; the overall row is the weighted total out of 100.

Category
affilka logo Affilka by SOFTSWISS
myaffiliates logo MyAffiliates
Winner
C1 Technology & Real-Time Capabilities · 24%
76%
76%
Tie
C2 iGaming-Specific Programme Management · 18%
88%
92%
MyAffiliates
C3 Platform UX & Operational Efficiency · 13%
80%
72%
Affilka by SOFTSWISS
C4 Fraud Detection, Risk & Security · 10%
68%
72%
MyAffiliates
C5 Integrations & Ecosystem Fit · 7%
72%
68%
Affilka by SOFTSWISS
C6 Onboarding, Documentation & Support · 6%
76%
76%
Tie
C7 Scalability, Performance & Reliability · 7%
80%
92%
MyAffiliates
C8 Pricing Transparency & Value · 5%
64%
56%
Affilka by SOFTSWISS
C9 Market Presence · 2%
80%
92%
MyAffiliates
C10 Customisability & Platform Flexibility · 8%
72%
68%
Affilka by SOFTSWISS
Overall score
77.0
77.2
Winner: MyAffiliates

The case for each

Opening analysis

Affilka and MyAffiliates are both iGaming-native platforms, but they appeal to different buying instincts. MyAffiliates has a longer operating history and stronger public market proof. Affilka has a more modern profile, clear SOFTSWISS connection, and good fit for casino and sportsbook operators that want a pure iGaming platform. The scores are close, so the comparison should focus on whether the buyer values market maturity or a newer product environment.

Category breakdown

Head-to-head, category by category

C1

Technology and real-time capabilities

Tie
affilka logo

Affilka by SOFTSWISS

76%
myaffiliates logo

MyAffiliates

76%

Both platforms scored 76% in Technology. Affilka has public real-time statistics, but the 15-minute update cadence keeps it below the highest-scoring platforms. MyAffiliates has long-running product capability, but public modern API and real-time detail is limited. Winner: Tie.

C2

iGaming-specific programme management

Winner: MyAffiliates
affilka logo

Affilka by SOFTSWISS

88%
myaffiliates logo

MyAffiliates

92%

Gap: 4 pts in favour of MyAffiliates

MyAffiliates scored 92% in iGaming programme management versus 88% for Affilka. Both support core operator needs such as multi-brand management, player tracking, and commission models. MyAffiliates gets the edge because its long focus on gaming affiliate operations supports a slightly higher category score. Winner: MyAffiliates.

C3

Platform UX and operational efficiency

Winner: Affilka by SOFTSWISS
affilka logo

Affilka by SOFTSWISS

80%
myaffiliates logo

MyAffiliates

72%

Gap: 8 pts in favour of Affilka by SOFTSWISS

Affilka scored 80% in UX/Ops compared with 72% for MyAffiliates. This is where Affilka feels more current in the scoring model. MyAffiliates remains functional, but its legacy profile creates more usability risk. Winner: Affilka.

C5

Integrations and ecosystem fit

Winner: Affilka by SOFTSWISS
affilka logo

Affilka by SOFTSWISS

72%
myaffiliates logo

MyAffiliates

68%

Gap: 4 pts in favour of Affilka by SOFTSWISS

Affilka scored 72% on Integrations versus 68% for MyAffiliates. The gap is small and both have some public API transparency limits. Affilka edges ahead because its API/export story is clearer, even if some documentation appears gated. Winner: Affilka.

C7

Scale and reliability

Winner: MyAffiliates
affilka logo

Affilka by SOFTSWISS

80%
myaffiliates logo

MyAffiliates

92%

Gap: 12 pts in favour of MyAffiliates

MyAffiliates scored 92% in Scale/Reliability against Affilka at 80%. Its longer market use and established operator base give it a clear advantage. Affilka has credible SOFTSWISS-backed scale, but the scoring still favours the older platform here. Winner: MyAffiliates.

C9

Market presence and proof

Winner: MyAffiliates
affilka logo

Affilka by SOFTSWISS

80%
myaffiliates logo

MyAffiliates

92%

Gap: 12 pts in favour of MyAffiliates

MyAffiliates scored 92% in Market presence compared with Affilka at 80%. Affilka has visible momentum and strong parent-company relevance, but MyAffiliates has deeper independent recognition as an affiliate platform. That market maturity is the main reason it wins overall. Winner: MyAffiliates.

What really sets them apart

Key differences

  • 1

    Affilka has the stronger UX/Ops score and a more modern product feel.

  • 2

    MyAffiliates has stronger scale and market proof.

  • 3

    Both are credible on iGaming-specific programme management.

  • 4

    Affilka's public documentation and security proof still leave review questions.

Choose your fit

Who should choose which?

affilka logo

Choose

Affilka by SOFTSWISS if…

  • you want a pure iGaming platform connected to the SOFTSWISS ecosystem.
  • a more current admin experience matters more than the longest public market record.
Read Affilka by SOFTSWISS review
myaffiliates logo

Choose

MyAffiliates if…

  • you want a mature iGaming affiliate platform with stronger legacy proof.
  • market familiarity and long-term operator use are major buying factors.
Read MyAffiliates review

Final call

Verdict

MyAffiliates wins by a narrow score margin because it has stronger market, scale, and iGaming programme evidence. Affilka is not far behind and may be the better choice for operators already aligned with SOFTSWISS or looking for a newer interface. The decision should be based on demo quality and integration requirements. MyAffiliates is the safer legacy pick; Affilka is the more modern ecosystem pick.

Keep comparing

cellxpert logo Cellxpert
vs
MyAffiliates myaffiliates logo

Cellxpert versus MyAffiliates is a direct iGaming-native matchup. Both platforms understand casino and sportsbook affiliate programmes, commission rules, multi-brand operations, and affiliate manager workflows. MyAffiliates brings age, client familiarity, and customisation depth. Cellxpert wins the scoring model by pairing iGaming-native functionality with stronger technology, UX, integrations, and operational speed, while still acknowledging that MyAffiliates has more legacy market proof.

Read comparison
cellxpert logo Cellxpert
vs
Affilka by SOFTSWISS affilka logo

This is a comparison between two iGaming-native products, but they have different buyer profiles. Cellxpert ranks higher because it scores better across technology, data granularity, integrations, fraud controls, and pricing clarity. Affilka by SOFTSWISS is a strong fit for operators that want a pure casino and sportsbook affiliate system, especially where the SOFTSWISS ecosystem is relevant. The deciding questions are refresh speed, API transparency, and how much the buyer values ecosystem alignment versus platform flexibility.

Read comparison
myaffiliates logo MyAffiliates
vs
Income Access income-access logo

MyAffiliates versus Income Access is a close legacy iGaming comparison. MyAffiliates scores slightly higher overall because it performs better on iGaming programme management, UX, fraud/security, and pricing. Income Access wins categories tied to scale, onboarding, technology, and market proof. Operators choosing between the two should focus less on headline reputation and more on which workflow fits their affiliate team: customisable platform control or service-led incumbent support.

Read comparison